"Breaking" Epimenide's Loop

Traditionally:

However by adding a separate level of depth we resolve the antinomy to a summation of nonzero value:

Which continues with an alternating true false pattern, Note that as G(F) is false we may say it is false:

As it is false, the statement that it is false is in and of itself false:

This is thus true, and now the alternating takes place:

Thus this series evaluates to an overall False statement which breaks Epimenide’s loop when this second level of using a falsification cascade is used. Naturally one could go further and only use false statements, by negating True statements:

CR Detector Code (Direct Detector Side)

Quick code writeup for the detector side of things:

int x=1;
int a1=1;
int a2=2;
int a3=3;
int a4=4;

stp
Serial.begin(9600);
fin
lp
if(x=<4){
Serial.println(analogRead("a"+x);
}
x=1
fin

which converts to:

int x=1;
int a1=1;
int a2=2;
int a3=3;
int a4=4;

void setup() {


Serial.begin(9600);

}

void loop(){

if(x=<4){
Serial.println(analogRead("a"+x);
}
x=1
}

Ray detector components

All of the pieces are finally here.

Mobile Printing Solution

Program for printing from anywhere. Any format can be printed as long as one is connected to the Internet. It requires login which are what the bottom two text fields are for.

Robot Returns

Robot is back from showcase and phototransistors for OCRT arrived, still waiting for laser modules.